[Kemas Kini] Jamil Sanggup Bersumpah Nafi Dakwaan Guna Wang Zakat Ubah Suai Rumah, Namun MEMBISU Isu Guna Wang Zakat Dahulukan Yuran Guaman. Mengapa?
Isu ini sudah meletup sejak minggu lalu. Banyak blog dan portal berita yang membicarakan isu ini. Ada portal berita yang mengaitkan rumah mewah Jamil Khir dengan tindakan Jamil Khir menggunakan wang zakat untuk mendahulukan bayaran yuran guamannya.
Mengapa Jamil Khir membisu?
Jawapannya mudah kerana hal ini disahkan oleh Laporan Audit Negara 2010. Laporan itu mengesahkan sebanyak RM63 650 dikeluarkan dari dana zakat Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan (MAIWP) untuk mendahulukan bayaran khidmat guaman Jamil Khir. Kos guaman itu bersabit kes tuntutan qazaf Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang menamakan Jamil; pengarah Jabatan Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan, Datuk Che Mat Che Ali dan ketua pendakwanya, Shamsuddin Hussain sebagai responden.
Malah ada blog yang menyiarkan beberapa dokumen yang mengaitkan Jamil Khir dengan penyalahgunaan wang zakat tersebut. Misalnya:
Dokumen lain boleh dilihat di sini. |
Walaupun dinyatakan bahawa wang zakat itu diganti dengan geran kerajaan, namun jelas duit rakyat tetap hangus digunakan untuk membayar kos guaman. Mengapa Jamil Khir bertindak atas kapasiti kerajaan tidak menggunakan peguam kerajaan?
Satu lagi perkara yang agak melucukan apabila terkenang betapa pantas dan tegasnya Jamil Khir menjawab dakwaan yang dibuat yang mengaitkan penggunaan wang zakat untuk pengubahsuaian rumah mewahnya. Anda ingat apa yang diungkap oleh Jamil Khir di media? Kata Jamil Khir ketika menjawab isu ini:
“Wallahi, saya tak ambil duit zakat, boleh semak zakat Wilayah Persekutuan dapat audit bersih.
“Saya berani bersumpah kalau mereka berani."
Waktu itu, Jamil Khir sanggup bersumpah!!!Sekarang, mengapa dia membisu?? -DCM
P/s: Ha ha ha ha!
Cuba baca pula pandangan orang yang pandai undang-undang di bawah ini:
Cuba baca pula pandangan orang yang pandai undang-undang di bawah ini:
Dalam satu e-mel yang dikirimkan kepada Ketua Polis Negara, bekas pegawai polis Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim menegaskan “Pembayaran semula setiap sen wang zakat yang telah disalahgunakan tidak boleh dijadikan alasan untuk membersihkan sesiapapun daripada rekod salah laku atau mengecualikan seseorang daripada tindakan undang-undang.
Oleh itu, beliau menggesa supaya Jamil Khir dan dua lagi pihak yang terlibat dikenakan tindakan undang-undang kerana telah menyalahgunakan wang zakat untuk membayar yuran guaman mereka.
Menurut Seksyen 403 Kanun Keseksaan yang berkaitan menyalahgunakan harta dengan curang, memperuntukkan bahawa 'Barangsiapa dengan curangnya menyalahgunakan atau menjadikan bagi kegunaannya sendiri atau menyebabkan mana-mana orang melupuskan apa-apa harta hendaklah diseksa dengan penjara selama tempoh tidak kurang daripada enam bulan dan tidak lebih daripada lima tahun dan dengan sebat dan bolehlah juga dikenakan denda. Kesalahan menyalahgunakan harta dengan curang tidak perlu diambil daripada pemilikan mangsa, cukup sekadar harta itu telah disalahgunakan dengan curang oleh penjenayah.
Oleh itu, perbuatan menyalahgunakan harta dengan curang merujuk kepada perlakuan menggunakan harta yang bukan harta kepunyaan sendiri malah harta orang lain untuk faedah dan kegunaan sendiri.
Perkataan 'harta' di sini menurut Akta Intrepetasi mencakupi harta alih dan juga harta tidak alih.- ASD
******************************************
Mat Zain: Charge Jamil, two others for alleged zakat abuse
[TMI] KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 27 — Former senior police officer Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim charged today that Umno minister Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom and two others should face legal action for wrongfully using zakat funds to settle their personal legal fees last year.
In an email to Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ismail Omar here, Mat Zain said there was proof enough that the trio had committed the alleged misdeeds when the matter was recorded in the pages of the Auditor-General’s report for 2010.
According to the report, Jamil, the minister in the Prime Minister’s Department in charge of Islamic affairs; Federal Territory Islamic Religious Council (MAIWP) director Datuk Che Mat Che Ali; and MAIWP chief prosecutor Shamsudin Hussain had withdrawn RM63,650 from the council’s zakat fund to settle their legal costs. The costs were incurred when Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim named the trio as respondents in his qazaf application.
However, the A-G’s report also confirmed that the sum was repaid to the fund after the council obtained a RM700,00 grant in June last year as part of its general resources allocation from the government.
But, citing legal provisions, Mat Zain insisted in his email that the trio had committed misappropriation of property under Section 403 of the Penal Code and should be punished accordingly.
Section 403 states: “Whoever dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use, or causes any other person to dispose of, any property, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months and not more than five years and with whipping and shall also be liable to fine”.
“In short, this means the misappropriation of property for temporary personal use, whether for just a day, is considered wrong according to this Section,” said Mat Zain.
He also pointed to Section 409A of the Penal Code, which states that: “It is no defence for any offence prescribed in sections 403... to show that the property was openly appropriated or that the appropriation was duly recorded and entered into the books and accounts of any company or association or body of person whether incorporated or not”.
“In short, it means the moment the use of the zakat funds was made openly and recorded in any account or official records of the MAIWP, it remains a wrongdoing and the record cannot be use as defence.
“Instead, it is that record that becomes strong evidence to show the offence took place,” said Mat Zain, adding that the A-G’s report was sufficient to prove a prima facie case against the trio.
“The repayment of every single sen misused cannot be used as an excuse to clean anyone’s record from wrongdoing or to exempt the person from legal action,” he said.
Mat Zain also cited Section 409B of the Penal Code, which states that if any offence prescribed in Section 403 and 404 is proven, “it shall be presumed that he had acted dishonestly until the contrary is proved”.
“With the above explanation, I have no doubt that Jamil, Che Mat and Shamsuddin committed offences under Section 403 of the Penal Code and, if convicted, will be liable for action under the same section.
“At the same time, there is no authority that can indemnify them,” he said.
Mat Zain also stressed that the trio’s use of zakat monies for personal reasons was wrongful according to Islamic laws, chastising Jamil for doing so just months after he was sworn into his ministerial post.
He then repeated an earlier allegation against Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak for dropping the “Mohd” or “Muhammad” from his name when taking an oath on two affidavits signed on September 21 and 23 this year.
“What lies before the people today is a prime minister and a minister for religion who purposefully exposed themselves to criminal charges which could see them jailed, just so they could hide something.
“But the most important question is why, in order to protect the National Feedlot Centre project, the government was willing to spend RM250 million, and for cosmetic improvements to the country and PM’s image, the government paid APCO and FBC more than RM150 million... but when it comes to religious matters, the minister for religion... [appropriated] zakat funds... money for the poor and the orphaned?
“Is this what PM Najib meant by championing Islamic teachings?” Mat Zain said.
P/s: Apabila membaca berita ini, rasa-rasanya, algi bertambah beratlah mulut Jamil Khir untuk menjawab isu ini.
Leave a comment
Sila lontarkan pandangan anda sama ada melalui komen di blog atau di laman Facebook.
Berikanlah pandangan yang bertanggungjawab,tidak berunsur fitnah, tanpa menggunakan kata-kata lucah & kesat melampau (dilepaskan jika sesuai), dan semolek-moleknya biarlah berkaitan dengan isi artikel.
Kepada "Anynomous", sila letakkan nama pena anda. Jangan berani bersuara, tetapi takut memperkenalkan diri!
PERHATIAN:
Komen yang disiarkan di blog atau di laman Facebook tidak semestinya menggambarkan pandangan atau pendirian Duniacacamarba (DCM).
Blog ini TIDAK BERTANGGUNGJAWAB terhadap setiap pandangan atau pendapat yang diutarakan melalui laman sosial FACEBOOK atau yang terlepas siar di RUANG KOMEN blog. Komen itu adalah pandangan peribadi pemilik akaun.
Terima kasih.